|
|
TRIN-GYI-PHO-NYA: Tibet's Environment & Development
Digest
January, 2005, Vol. 2, No. 6
About
Trin-Gyi-Pho-Nya
Index
of Past Issues
I. Editorial: Designing
Modernization To Promote Traditional Tibetan Medicine
Tibetan medicine has become a lucrative business yielding
million-dollar profits to large pharmaceutical companies in China.
Various new policies have been instituted to standardize the production
and distribution of Tibetan medicinal products, mainly for commercial
and bureaucratic reasons. These new policies are proving to be a
debilitating legal framework for the persevering practitioners of
the unique Buddhist healing tradition.
According to a study, there are 75 pharmaceutical companies dealing
with Tibetan medicine in various corners of the Tibetan Plateau,
out of which 30 are run by Tibetans. While the spiritual guidelines
of making medicine according to the Buddhist medical texts –
Gyushi – are increasingly compromised with the onslaught of
industrial production of Tibetan medicine, an interesting issue
that comes to point is regarding the efficacy of the healing powers
of these medicine. “Amchi (Tibetan doctor) makes medicine
to heal the patient but the pharmaceutical companies make medicine
to reap profits,” explained a concerned Tibetan doctor from
Amdo (now incorporated in Qinghai Province).
New government regulations require all Tibetan doctors to go through
a cumbersome registration process. When approved, they are allowed
to sell medicine, but only to their private patients. Rinchen-Tsotru-Dashel,
a pill that normally costs 20 yuan, is now being sold for 50 yuan
by pharmaceutical companies.
“Soon, we will be barred from producing these medicines as
Chinese companies are gaining patents over different Tibetan medicines,”
said the doctor. To the Tibetan people, the long-term issues involve
the survival of this centuries-old healing tradition, as well as
the access members of the community have to the tradition. Surely
the ultimate subversion of the Tibetan medical tradition would be
if the Tibetan people themselves were forced to purchase medicine
invented by their own culture and made from their own land, at a
higher cost, and from a Chinese company because of a contrived patent
system set-up to benefit large industries to the exclusion of local
practitioners.
Commercialization of Tibetan medicine also has environmental consequences.
Most of Tibetan medicine’s plant ingredients are rare herbs
that are endemic to Tibet’s high mountains. Currently, there
are no mechanisms in place to check indiscriminate harvesting of
these species. The commercialization of Tibetan medicine has dramatically
increased demands for these ingredients, resulting in the widespread,
unsustainable removal of certain plant species. Utpal Ngonpo (Blue
poppy, meconopsis sp.), marketed as a cure for Hepatitis B by Chinese
companies, is one such rare plant species that the Tibetan doctor
fears might not survive if the current rate of harvesting continues.
The challenge for policy makers in China is not just the integration
Tibetan medicine into the mainstream economy and modes of production,
but also the preservation and promotion of a unique tradition of
medical knowledge and expertise. While greater access to, and availability
of, Tibetan medicine is a worthwhile goal, it will mean very little
if the tradition which produced it is swallowed up and destroyed
in the process.
- top of page -
|
II. Op-ed: Climate Change as a Human Rights
Issue for Subsistence-Based Societies By Julia Klein
In December 2004, a meeting of the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change took place in Buenos Aires, Argentina,
in anticipation of the upcoming entry into force of the Kyoto Protocol.
At the same time, the Inuit -- 155,000 seal-hunting peoples scattered
around the Arctic -- announced they were preparing a petition to
the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights stating that the United
States, by contributing substantially to global warming, is threatening
their existence. The Inuit people's lives and culture depend upon
the Arctic ice. Scientists have concluded that climate change caused
predominantly by human influences is causing that ice to melt and
causing other impacts to the Inuit way of life. In their petition,
the Inuit assert that because the United States is responsible for
25% or more of the greenhouse gas emissions that are contributing
to climate change, the United States has an international obligation
to prevent these human rights violations. The Inter-American Commission
will forward the petition to the United States, which is the respondent,
hold a series of hearings on the matter and determine whether this
constitutes a violation of human rights.
Just as the Inuit rely on the arctic ice for their subsistence,
Tibetan pastoralists depend on the alpine rangelands of the Tibetan
Plateau for their survival. The pastoralists rely on the rangeland
vegetation to convert the sun's energy into products - via domestic
herbivores - that form the basis of their culture and subsistence.
These products include food, clothing, housing, fuel, stored wealth,
and transportation. The Tibetans also directly rely on vegetation
for goods such as medicinal plants and other products.
Scientists, range managers and development personnell working on
the Tibetan Plateau have primarily ignored issues of climate warming
effects on the Tibetan rangelands. Rather, they have focused on
the Tibetan rangelands with respect to grazing issues. The Tibetan
rangeland debate is often couched in terms of whether the Tibetans
are "rational" or "irrational" land managers,
whether animal densities are increasing or decreasing on the Tibetan
Plateau, the merits and drawbacks of fencing and sedentarization,
and the effects of small mammal grazing on the rangelands. While
most of these issues are very important, they should be studied
in the context of a changing underlying climatic condition. These
topics also highlight the propensity for scientists, range managers
and development personnell working on the Tibetan Plateau to observe
rangeland degradation, observe grazing animals (or fences or small
mammals), and make a causal connection between the two based on
observation rather than a valid scientific analysis of cause and
effect.
While very little research has been conducted on how climate warming
may affect ecosystem goods and services on the Tibetan Plateau,
work has recently been published in the scientific literature (Klein
et al. 2004) that shows climate warming could cause as much as a
36% decline in plant species diversity on the northeastern region
of the Tibetan Plateau. This includes declines in medicinal plant
species and palatable forage species richness. This work also indicates
warming could reduce overall vegetative productivity and increase
shrub encroachment in this region of the Tibetan Plateau (Klein
2003).
There is a consensus among the scientific community that much of
the present climate warming on Earth is due to human activities
(IPCC 2001). According to the New York Times, the United States
was the only country at the climate meetings in Buenos Aires which
continues to question the climate change science. There is also
evidence that climate warming is occurring on the Tibetan Plateau
(Thompson et al. 2000). China, which ratified the Kyoto Protocol
in 1992, is the second largest emitter of greenhouse gases, but
per capita emissions of global warming pollutants in China are just
15 percent of U.S. levels. China accepted no mandatory greenhouse
gas emissions target under the Protocol -- only developed countries
are subject to binding emission targets in the Kyoto Protocol's
first emission control period, 2008 to 2012.
Climate warming is an unusual environmental problem because the
primary actors driving the changes can be far removed from the most
vulnerable recipients of the climate change effects. This large
spatial disconnect between drivers and recipients is due to the
nature of greenhouse gases, which mix relatively rapidly in the
atmosphere across the globe. The Inuit people can assert their rights
in the international arena because there has been careful documentation
of climate change in the arctic, because the ecological and social
impacts of climate change on the Inuit people have been rigorously
studied for over a decade, and because supporters of the Inuit people
recognize the links between politics, human rights and climate change.
The Tibetan pastoralists, who are potentially highly vulnerable
to climate change impacts, will also need to rely on rigorous science
and an interested community to assert their rights to a resource
base that is being affected by anthropogenic climate changes and
to bring this issue to the attention of the international community.
References cited:
1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2001. Climate
change 2001: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2001:
The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third
Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(ed. Houghton, J.T., Griggs, D.J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P.J.,
Dai, X., Maskell, K., & Johnson, C.A.). Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge.
2. Klein, J.A., J. Harte & X.Q. Zhao. 2004. Experimental warming
causes large and rapid species loss, dampened by simulated grazing,
on the Tibetan Plateau. Ecology Letters 7(12) 1170-1179.
3. Klein, Julia A. 2003. Climate warming and pastoral land use change:
implications for carbon cycling, biodiversity and rangeland quality
on the Northeastern Tibetan Plateau, PhD Thesis, University of California,
Berkeley.
4. Thompson L.G., Yao T., Mosley-Thompson E., Davis M.E., Henderson
K.A. & Lin P.-N. (2000) A high-resolution millennial record
of the South Asian monsoon from Himalayan ice cores. Science, 289,
1916-1919.
[*Julia Klein is a NOAA Postdoctoral Fellow
at the Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory of Colorado State University,
and can be reached via e-mail at jklein@cnr.colostate.edu]
- top of page -
|
III. Western Route Water Transfer Project
Should Be Reconsidered
By Lu Jiaguo. Translated by Dolkar Tenzing
(Source: www.chinariver.org/document/snwt1.pdf,
www.chinariver.org/document/snwt2.pdf,
www.chinariver.org/document/snwt3.pdf)
The Western Route Transfer Project, or simply "the
Western Route," is the most expensive and difficult route of
the worlds longest and most ambitious water transfer project - South-North
Water Diversion Project. The Western Route involves diverting waters
from the headwaters of Drichu (Yangtze River) into Machu (Yellow
River) through a number of large dams and a series of aqueducts
and tunnels. Following is an abridged version of critical essay
on the project. Researchers are advised to refer to the original
Chinese article for more accurate information. Also refer to our
last
update on the project.
In the last decade, Yellow River Conservancy Committee (YRCC) has
studied water transfer plans from Tongtian (Ngagchu in Tibetan),
Yalong (Thogthon Chuwo in Tibetan) and Dadu (Gyarong Ngulchu in
Tibetan) rivers. In accordance with the initial study, the total
direct water flow of the three rivers is estimated to be around
271 m3 and the maximum transferable water quantity from those three
rivers is about 17 billion m3 - including 8 billion m3 from Tongtian
River, 5 billion m3 from Ada of Yalong River, and 4 billion m3 from
five water stations in Yalong river and Daduhe River.
Water Availability
The original plan of the Western Route of South-North Water Diversion
Project (or simply "Western Route". Brief project description
available online here)
overestimated the flow capacity of the three source rivers and did
not look into the impact of seasonal changes of water flow. Water
flow in these rivers declines significantly during the seven-month
dry season, i.e., from November to May. According to the survey
conducted by SNWD Research Team from China Academy of Science, during
the seven-month dry season, the total water flow quantity of the
three rivers only has 5.9 billion cubic meters (BCM). For a year,
the total water flow quantity of the three rivers is 10.22 BCM.
If we add water in the reservoirs and consider water usage by the
population density in the downstream then, the total quantity of
water actually transferable in the Western Route of South-North
Water Diversion project is 10.36 BCM, which is far less than project
plans [of 17 billion cubic meters]. In addition, these rivers have
a high water flow fluctuations between dry and wet seasons, contributing
further to the quantity of transferable water.
Environmental Implications
The environmental condition around upper Yangtze River has been
deteriorating due to excessive logging in the past two decades.
Forest cover in western Sichuan area has decreased from 26% 50 years
ago to 13.1%. At present, desertification and soil erosion has become
serious problems in the area. According to the Vice Director of
Qinghai Province, 67% of land area around upper Yangtze River has
become desert. 90% of swamp has dried out. Many lakes and streams
have stopped flowing. From 1970-1990, glaciers retreated 500 meters
on the upper Yangtze river.The glacial ice on Upper Yalong river
has shrunk by 200 to 400 meters and large areas around these areas
are becoming desert. A total rangeland area of 3,800,000 hectares
has been degraded. In the past ten years, the water flow of Totuo
river (origin of Yantze river) has decreased by 20%. Similarly,
Dadu River's annual water flow capacity has decreased by 14% in
the late 1990's compared to the 1950's.
The Western Route of South-North Water Diversion Project will worsen
the deteriorating environmental conditions in the upper Yangtze
River area, adversely affecting the regeneration capacity of the
local ecosystems. If water diversion is actually implemented, it
will destroy the threatened ecosystem forever and increase soil
erosion and desertification in the area.
Seismic Dangers
The Western Route passes through Hengduan Mountains, which is a
very active seismic area. The proposed dams on Tongtian River and
Yalong River are located on Xianshuihe fault zone. Eighteen-earthquakes
happened in these areas from 1901-1971.
Yellow River Conservancy Commission (YRCC)'s report has pointed
out the geological difficulties and dangers faced in construction
of west route including the earthquake belt, but YRCC has not found
any workable solution and measurements for this difficulty and danger.
According to current plans, 508 kilometers of aqueducts and 490
kilometers of tunnels will be constructed above this earthquake
belt. A total reservoir area of 397 square kilometers lie above
the fault line.
Cost/Benefit Analysis
The Yellow River is short of water but its water resources have
not yet been properly utilized. Wastage of precious water is a common
practice along the Yellow River. Experts calculate that around 9.3
to 10.9 billion cubic meters of water can be saved or better utilized
if integrated water saving techniques were used in agriculture.
The saved amount of water is almost equal to the total quantity
of project's transferable water. The investment for the agricultural
integrated water saving technique if made, will be approximately
around 37.2 billion yuan- 43.6 billion yuan, This will be equivalent
to 6.6% of the total cost of the west route water transfer project.
The agricultural integrated water saving techniques can be completed
in about ten years whereas the west route construction will take
about 30 -50 years. Therefore, the rationale behind the investment
on west route water transfer construction is questionable.
Loss of Power Supply Capacity for the Upper Yangtze River
The Western Route will significantly reduce annual water flow in
the upper Yangtze River. This will cause frequent power supply shortages.
Yalong River, for example, has a total direct annual water flow
capacity of 51 BCM. It has a total installed capacity of 28.5 million
watt and a capacity to produce 151.6 billion kilowatts electricity
annually. The construction of the water transfer station in the
Yalong river will result in a loss of 25 billion kw of power output.
The percentage of loss is around 16.6. According to project plans,
there are around 69 hydropower stations along the Yangtze River.
These hydropower stations will have an installed capacity of 1.3
billion kilowatt and a capacity to produce 770 billion kilowatt
hours of electricity annually. After the water transfer, 111 billion
kilowatts of electricity output will be lost yearly. The percentage
of loss is 14.5, which is equal to 133% of total annually electricity
output of Three Gorges Project. If the market price for one unit
is 0.25 yuan, then around 27 billion Chinese yuan is lost per year.
Need for Scientific and Democratic Decision Making
The Western Route is a trans-provincial project involving residents'
rights of both rivers-Yellow as well as Yangtze. So far, only YCRR
is involved in planning and exploration work of the project. Provincial
governments and people along the two rivers have not been involved
in the planning and decision making process. In the Western Route
Water Transfer Committee meeting held on May 2002, out of the 70
participants there was only one person from Sichuan Province Water
Bureau and one person from Yangtze River Conservancy Committee.
It is improper to exclude stakeholders from the concerned provinces
in the decision making process. The committee should include not
only Central Government and YRCC, but also Yangtze River Conservancy
Committee and all concerned provincial governments such as Qinghai,
Gansu, Ningxia, Inner Mongolia, Shanzi, Henan, Sichuan, Yunnan,
TAR, Chongqing and Hubei. Different ideas and criticisms should
be allowed for discussion at the committee meetings. The Plan will
be more scientific only after the consideration of all opposing
opinions.
The Western Route water transfer project is planned to solve water
shortage problem of Yellow River by diverting water from upper Yangtze
River. In terms of feasibility, economic effectiveness and efficiency
of the plan, there are still many unsolved problems. The project
lacks scientific research and evaluation. Therefore, the plan for
the Western Route needs thorough reevaluation before implementation.
- top of page -
|
IV. IV. Earthquake warning system for dams
a priority: experts
By Ray Cheung (Source:
South China Morning Post. 4 January 2005. Courtesy: Kevin Li)
Mainland environmentalists have launched a petition urging
the government to fast-track the establishment of an earthquake warning
system in the southwest. They said it would help prevent a human
disaster such as the Asian tsunami triggered by the recent Indonesian
earthquake.
A geological warning network was critical to protect the public
amid plans to build a series of massive dams in the region for hydroelectric
power projects, they added.
Premier Wen Jiabao had recently ordered the appropriate agencies
to establish such a system, environmentalists said.
At a time when China is developing the southwest's water resources,
there must be an adherence to Premier Wen Jiabao's order in which
an earthquake warning network and forecasting system for current
and future large-scale water resources protection be established,
they said.
The petition [was] signed by six environmental groups including
Green Earth Volunteers, Friends of Nature and the Global Village
of Beijing, and individuals including a member of the Chinese People's
Political Consultative Conference.
They also called for a stricter assessment of the vulnerability
to earthquakes of all proposed dam projects in the region.
The southwest, particularly the Tibet Autonomous Region and Yunnan
province, is home to some of the mainland's largest watersheds,
including the Lancang [Zachu], Nujiang [Gyalmo Ngulchu], and Jinsha
[Drichu] rivers. To meet the nation's surging energy demands, the
central and local governments have announced plans to build a series
of controversial dam projects on the waterways.
Citing the Nujiang as an example, the petitioners said the authorities
had only managed to produce a half-page report on the project's
earthquake risks, as part of its environmental impact assessment.
The project's opponents have warned that the dams will not only
destroy the pristine environment, but also be vulnerable to the
area's frequent earthquakes, which could spell disaster.
- top of page -
|
VI. News-in-Brief
(Prepared by Thupten Norbu*)
1. China decides to dam its last free-flowing
river, Nu Jiang
(Source: Chinadaily, Interfax, Wen Wei Po)
According to new information, China will go ahead with the construction
of Liuku Dam, the first of the 13 dams planned on Salween River
(Gyalmo Ngulchu in Tibetan, Nu Jiang in Chinese) in the year 2005.
The project was earlier suspended due to an unprecedented intervention
from China's Premier, Wen Jiabao, in response to the efforts of
Chinese civil society leaders and press reporters to save "China's
last free-flowing river." The project also attracted downstream
international concerns, as well as from the UN -- nine of the three
dams fall within the UNESCO World Heritage Site. One of the 13 dams
will be constructed in Tibetan inhabited area, Songta. Songta dam
will be the tallest (307 meters) and the northern-most of the 13
dams and is expected to displace more than 3,600 people.
According to Interfax, National Development and Reform Commission
(NDRC) and the State Environmental Protection Administration (SEPA)
invited experts to a consultative conference on the environmental
impact of the Nu hydropower project. However, the proceedings and
outcome of the conference has not been released. Local civil society
leaders are calling for a "peoples hearing" to ensure
public participation in project governance.
2. Accounting Non-cash Incomes of Tibetan Farmers and Herders
(Source: People's Daily, personal communication
with Andrew Fischer)
People's
Daily reported that the per capita cash income of farmers and
herdsmen in the Tibetan Autonomous Region (TAR) increased to 1,035
yuan ($124.6) by the end of September this year, an increase of
187 yuan or 22 percent from last year. It is predicted that the
net income of farmers and herdsmen would reach 1,850 yuan as a result
of fast developing industries in farming and pastoral areas and
structural adjustment in agricultural and animal husbandry. However,
these official Chinese statistics do not account for the major portion
of local people's income.
According to development economist Andrew Fischer, "the 22
percent increase refers to an increase in cash income, not the total
income of farmers and herders. Total income includes an estimate
for non-cash income, such as agricultural output that farmers and
herders consume themselves or barter. The cash component, which
up to very recently has been a small share of total rural incomes
in the TAR, deflects attention from the slow growth in the more
traditional activities of farming and herding. Given that rural
industry in the TAR is extremely limited, most of the increase in
cash income is probably due to efforts by the government since 2002
to increase the participation of rural Tibetans in various construction
projects as a means to supply off-farm employment. It is unlikely
that the increase is generally due to "fast developing industries
in farming and pastoral areas," given that, if such cases exist,
they are concentrated in specific pockets and are probably subsidized
by project funding."
3. Dali-Li Jiang Railway Project Approved by Asian Development
Bank
(Source: Xihuanet, Interfax. December 6)
Asian Development Bank (ADB) has approved $180 million for a 167
km railway line from Dali county to the city of Li Jiang (Satham:
Tibetan) in the northwestern Yunnan Province. According to Interfax,
other investors in this $548 million project are Agence Francaise
de Developpment ($40 million), the Chinese Ministry of Railways
($229.6 million) and the Yunnan provincial government ($ 98.4 million).
Economic development induced by the railway project is expected
to disrupt the traditional livelihood of ethnic minorities in the
region, from where the project is expected to resettle 8,000 local
people. (Read ADB
president's report on the project to the Boards of Directors.
The report notes that the project would have adverse impacts to
local people and the environment, and that appropriate measures
would be taken.)
4. Massive Protests Cause Suspension of Pubugou Hydropower
Project
(Source: The Epoch Times, Interfax, Associate
Press, Reuters, South China Morning Post, Straits Times. November,
2004)
Tens of thousands (50,000 according to most reports) of residents
of Hanyuan county in Sichuan Province protested against the construction
of Pubugou Hydropower project in late October this year. As Trin-Gyi-Pho-Nya
have been reporting, local people subject to forced resettlement
to make way for Pubuguo dam project on the Dadu River (Gyalrong
Gyamo Ngulchu in Tibetan) are unhappy with the government's relocation
practices. Armed police had dragged many people who had refused
to move out of their homes. Many farmers felt cheated by the government
as they were moved to a different site, not the one promised and
for which they were made to sign agreements. Others who were moved
from Hanyuan County were further disappointed to learn that the
cost of land in the new city is 180 yuan more expensive per square
meter than the government compensation of 320 yuan per square kilometers
for their traditional homes. As more farmers joined the protest,
more police were deployed that resulted in several clashes and an
unverifiable number of deaths - a tragedy reminiscent of the 1989
Tiananmen Square massacre. President Hu Jintao and Premier Wen Jiabao
are reported to have stepped in to calm the farmers and issued orders
to the provincial government to "protect the interest of farmers."
The government now plans to resolve relocation issues before starting
construction.
The Pubugou Project began construction in April 2004. The project
is expected to displace 100,894 people and inundate an area of 84.14
square kilometers of land that includes 20 counties and townships,
65 villages and 8457 acres of good agricultural land in Hanyuan
county (approx. 103 degrees longitude and 29 degrees latitude).
Hanyuan County is an area of cultural and historic importance and
home to people of 17 different "minority nationalities,"
including Tibetans.
5. Endangered Tibetan Black Bear
(Source: Tibet Information Network. Direct quote
from December 3 Tibet News Digest)
Tibetan black bears are on the verge of extinction in the PRC with
the population in the wild nearly halved during the past decade,
mainly due to poaching to extract their bile for medicine, according
to reports in the Chinese state news agency, Xinhua. A recent survey
conducted by the forestry administration in the TAR shows the region
has approximately 7,031 black bears, down from 14,062 in 1994; the
last time such a survey was carried out. Also known as the Asiatic
black bear, it is now one of the most threatened of the world's
six endangered bear species. "The decline in the black bear
population is mainly a result of illegal poaching, particularly
in the second half of the 20th century," said Liu Wulin, head
of the regional forestry survey institute. Despite the animals being
under government protection, they are a target for poachers because
the bear's gall bladder is prized for traditional Chinese medicine
and there is great demand for its fur. Black bears are kept by the
thousands in China because their bile, extracted from their gall
bladders through surgically implanted catheters, is considered a
potent medicine.
6. The first foreign mining company in Tibet Autonomous
Region: Orchid
(Sources: Orchid Capital Mining News. December,
2004)
Orchid Resource Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of Australian
Venture Capital investment group Orchid Capital Limited, created
for "the exploration and development of resources opportunities
in China," received all the necessary approvals and licenses
from the government of the Tibet Autonomous Region, to form a cooperative
joint venture with China Tibet Institute of Geology Survey (CTGS)
called the Tibet Pioneer Mining Company Limited (TPMC). Orchid owns
70% and CTGS has 30% of TPMC's share. Orchid is the first foreign
company to operate in TAR and has been called "Partner of Choice
for Future Deals in Region." TPMC is currently focusing in
the Nagartse gold project, approximately 100 km southwest of Lhasa.
(For more information click
here). Last year, an Australian mining company, Sino Gold attempted
to operate in eastern Tibet and faced heavy international outcry.
Tibetan rights groups argue that it is unethical and irresponsible
to extract Tibet's resources while Tibetans do not have the right
to decide the use of their own resource.
7. Tenzin Delek Rinpoche On Death Row But Still Alive
(Source: Agence France-Presse. December 13)
According to reports, Tenzin Delek Rinpoche, who's death sentence
suspension expired on December 2, 2004, is still alive. An official
at the southwest Sichuan province prison administrative bureau is
quoted as having said, "This monk has not been executed. I
heard they're considering changing his penalty to life imprisonment
or a fixed-term penalty." Tenzin Delek Rinpoche was given death
sentence on charges of "inciting separatism" and "causing
explosions" by the Ganzi Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture Intermediate
People's Court in Sichuan province on December 2, 2002. In the recent
months, many human rights organizations and Tibet support groups
organized rallies and protests around the world to condemn his death
sentence. On December 7, 2004, the US senate unanimously passed
a resolution (Senate Resolution 483) calling for the release of
Tenzin Delek Rinpoche and other political prisoners.
Tenzin Delek Rinpoche is a widely respected religious teacher and
a community leader who has won the heart and respect of the masses
in at least four counties of the Kardze Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture
of Sichuan Province. Rinpoche worked not only for the social, cultural,
economic, and spiritual aspirations of Tibetans, but also to conserve
the environment of the region. According to Human
Rights Watch, his endeavor to conserve the local environment
include educating against mining practice that would pollute the
local rivers and ruins the soil, logging practices that would cause
flooding and soil erosion, and indiscriminate hunting that might
lead to species loss. He also stood up to local officials to conserve
forest.
8. Tiger Leaping Gorge Dam Construction to Begin in 2008
(Source: The Globe and Mail. November 20)
According to new reports, the controversial dam project on Tiger
Leaping Gorge (Tak Chong Gak in Tibetan, Hutiaoxia in Chinese) in
Yunnan Province's Three Parallel Rivers World Heritage Site area
may begin in 2008. (See our last
editorial on the project) This provides enough time for all
concerned authorities to conduct various studies and address issues
raised by affected local peoples and critics of the project. Recently
many environmental organizations and concerned individuals have
petitioned the United Nation Educational Science and Cultural Organization
(UNESCO) World Heritage Committee and the World Conservation Union
(IUCN) to urge China to halt the project. "We need scientific
evidence demonstrating how and to what extend the dam project will
actually impair the integrity of the World Heritage Site, in order
to persuade these international bodies to take any action,"
said Tashi Tsering of Tibet Justice Center.
Other than immense environmental costs, the project will also devastate
the lives of tens of thousands of people, mostly Tibetans, Naxi,
Yi, Miao, Bai and Lisu ethnicities. These indigenous peoples live
in harmony with the local ecosystems and must be protected as an
integral part of world heritage. Their traditional livelihood and
their socio-cultural heritage is a world heritage that attracts
tourists and researchers from around the world. Most unique of these
cultures are the Naxi people, believed to be descendents of nomads
from Tibet. Naxi culture is based on unusual matriarchal traditions
and their shamans are considered the last people using a form of
hieroglyphics.
9. Might your dollars fund the death of a sacred lake?
(Source: Huaneng Power International. Courtesy
of Kevin Li)
Money raised from Huaneng Power International's IPO (Initial Public
Offerings) at New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), Hong Kong Exchanges
and Clearing Limited (HKEx), and Southern Connecticut Bancorp Inc
(SSE) may be used to drain a pristine, sacred lake in Tibet known
as the Yeti Lake (Megoe Tso in Tibetan and Mugecuo in Chinese) to
generate electricity. Huaneng Power International recently acquired
60% equity interest in Sichuan Huaneng Hydro Power Development Limited,
a subsidiary of China Huaneng Group. "It is critical to educate
subscribers of Huaneng IPO that their money might be used to fund
a dam project that the local people do not approve," said Tashi
Tsering, Director of Tibet Justice Center's Environment and Development
Program. "Anyone informed about the environmental and social
costs of Yeti Lake Dam Project will be loathe to buy Huaneng's shares."
(For our last update on the project, click
here.)
10. Golmud-Lhasa Railway Expected to Finish Before Its Scheduled
Date
(Source: People Daily, TIN. December, 2004)
People's Daily reported that construction of Golmud-Lhasa
Railway line may be completed before its scheduled time of 2007.
China has allocated additional budget to accelerate the completion
of the project. To date, 738 kilometers of railway track has been
laid down, extending to Gulu town of Nagchu county in Tibet.
To read a recent Washington Times editorial on the project, click
here
11. Switzerland based company to provide expertise for diversion
of Tibet's water
(Source: Electrowatt Infra Press Release. October
26)
Electrowatt Infra (EWI), an engineering consulting company based
in Zurich, has received a consultancy contract for the construction
of the Western Route of the South-North Water Diversion Project.
This project aims to divert waters from the headwaters of Drichu
(Yangtze) into the headwaters of Machu (Yellow River) through a
series of large dams, tunnels and aqueducts. According to the contract,
Electrowatt Infra will conduct "geological analysis, advice
and recommend on performance and selection of types of TBM [Tunnel
Boring Machines], forecast and handle-measures for unfavorable geological
conditions in tunnels construction, personnel arrangement for TBM
excavation, installations, air, water and electricity consumption,
etc."
[*Thupten Norbu is an intern with Tibet Justice
Center's Environment and Development Program. He can be reached
at khoryoug@yahoo.com)
|
- top of page -
Home | Contact
© copyright 1998-2002, Tibet Justice Center
|