Home

About Us

Projects

Events

News & Press Releases

Reports & Publications

Tibetan Asylum and Immigration Project

Tibet News

Join Tibet Justice Center

Subscription Center

Contact

Donate




_
_

Tibet Justice Center

TRIN-GYI-PHO-NYA:
Tibet's Environment & Development Digest


February 24, 2006, Vol. 4, No. 1
Guest Editor Taryn Firkser

About Trin-Gyi-Pho-Nya
Index of Past Issues


Tibetan Boy

Articles
Inchoate smoke signals from both sides of the Himalayas

Nortel wins China pipeline contract
Rangeland Management on the Tibetan Plateau
Save wildlife – our common heritage
China hydro-dams leave local Tibetan's poorer


News Analysis, Briefs, and Updates

Border Dispute Between China and Bhutan Flares over Rare Fungi

Jammu-Kashmir Yet to Conduct Chiru Census in Ladakh

Illiteracy and Education levels worsen in the TAR despite development drive
Iron-Ore Deposits Found on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau
Railway Update: Luxury Rail Service from Shanghai to Lhasa
Bush Forest on Fire in TAR
Animal Pelts Burned during Campaign in Rebkong
China Clamps Down on Sky Burials
TEAM Promotes Environmental Awareness at Kalachakra
Tibetan Mastiff Facing Extinction
Songta Dam on Gyalmo Ngulchu (Salween River) Suspended by China

Inchoate smoke signals from both sides of the Himalayas
By Tashi Tsering*

In the last few weeks, people in Tibetan villages and communities across the Tibetan Plateau and diaspora have been making bonfires of their clothing decorated with endangered species' skins and other animal products. The reported quantities of burnt skins -- inflated accounts estimated in the millions of dollars -- must raise the eyebrows of people who are not familiar with contemporary Tibetan dress culture, especially clothing worn during festivals in the Amdo and Kham regions (now incorporated into the provinces of Qinghai, Sichuan, Yunnan and Gansu). Even Tibetans in exile are surprised at the apparent extent of their people's involvement in the consumption of (and trade in) endangered animal products.

This sudden mass rejection of the use of animals’ skins on their traditional garments came in response to the Dalai Lama's repeated calls at a religious gathering -- January 2006 Amravati Kalachakra Teachings -- attended by a roughly estimated 100,000 Tibetans including 10,000 from Tibet. Various Tibetan groups engaged in environmental education campaigns in Amravati, especially targeting pilgrims from Tibet. However, it is wrong to assume that Tibetans in Tibet were not aware of the plight of these endangered animals before the Kalachakra. Many religious and environmental leaders in Kham and Amdo areas and even a rock band from Lhasa have been involved in educating their followers about endangered species issues for at least the last two years. However, the current wave of mass burning of animal skins was unexpected, and now the Chinese government, which use to support grassroots environmental initiatives around these issues earlier, has restricted Tibetan environmental efforts. The bonfire campaigns certainly have symbolic significance, their strategic sensibility and implications are becoming increasingly questionable.

Both the Tibetan involvement in the international trade in endangered species products and the campaigns to curb this situation, unfortunately, have been increasingly politicized by interest groups
and the media. Much of the impetus in this campaign in exile was actually sparked by certain scathing remarks by the Indian parliamentarian and animal rights activist, Maneka Gandhi, on an Indian TV news channel in November 2005. Maneka Gandhi essentially alleged that all Tibetans are poachers and that India should throw them out of the country. Similarly, international media attention was aroused by the Wildlife Protection Society of India and the London-based Environmental Investigation Agency at a press conference in September 2005, by providing shallow research findings with striking images of Tibetans exotically sporting large quantities of animal skins on their traditional dresses. Such hyped up stereotyping could have disastrous consequences for the politically vulnerable Tibetans who are sandwiched between the whims of India and China, especially now that common Tibetans have come out of the closet with their illegal animal products.

Quite predictably, in this blame game, Tibetans and supporters have accused the Chinese government of being the main culprit. They point to the fact that the Chinese government allows and encourages these practices for political and commercial reasons, as evidenced by the
popular Chinese media's depiction of the Tibetan people as an economically rich yet exotic people fond of showing off wild animals' skins. What purpose this blame game serves is quite unclear, but it is obvious that the limited Tibetan involvement is only a part of a much larger international syndicate that supplies animal body parts, such as bones and organs for their presumed healing qualities in traditional Chinese medicine. Meanwhile, Chinese authorities have been prompt in
their response: banning communal bonfires of animal skins, withdrawing support for local environmental efforts, especially around endangered species issues and arresting activists involved in the campaign on charges of being politically influenced by the "Dalai clique."

Both China and India are signatories to international covenants such as the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna and the Biodiversity Convention. In addition to international legal obligation to take action, the two countries now have an opportunity to develop bilateral ties by collaborating with the Tibetans to save many animals from extinction, especially the Bengal tiger and Tibetan antelope. China must first release the arrested activists and the two governments must openly welcome and support the Tibetan people's efforts to abandon the use of endangered species products. The two governments should provide support in the form of environmental education resources and help channel the current energy in Tibetan communities towards taking action against the poachers and smugglers who are the key culprits.

The various individuals and groups that are responsible for this uncoordinated campaign have far more work to do now. Please do not call these bonfires an "accomplished campaign" just yet. The real fire of this campaign must burn in people's minds in the form of knowledge and appreciation for nature's biological diversity. This fire should be sustained through public education programs in schools, monasteries and homes. Merely sending smoke signals of Tibetan national solidarity to
the Dalai Lama--without substantive environmental education or a political goal--will only make the situation more precarious.

[*Tashi Tsering is the editor of Trin-Gyi-Pho-Nya]

 

- top of page -

 

 

Nortel wins China pipeline contract
By Carole Samdup*

PetroChina, the state owned operators of China's controversial West-East Gas Pipeline have chosen Nortel Networks to supply communications, both wired and wireless, along its 4,200-kilometre route. The pipeline is the longest in China, spanning nine provinces, and will transport natural gas from the rich Lunnan gas fields of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region all the way to the economic hub of Shanghai and other regions of the Yangtze River Delta.

In September 2001, BP announced that it would pull out of the West-East pipeline project following an international campaign spearheaded by non-governmental organizations concerned about potential negative impacts on human rights and environmental protection.

China's leaders have since staked their credibility on successful completion of the pipeline. It has become a central component of the much-touted "Go West" initiative, introduced by President Jiang Zemin in 1999 as a way to lift China's western provinces out of poverty by pumping billions of dollars into the region, mostly for large infrastructure projects. Observers, however, claim that China’s “Go West:” strategy is more about political control than about development.

"This pipeline is being built more for political reasons than for economic reasons," said Dinakar Sethuraman, an analyst with World Gas Intelligence in Singapore. "Its prospects for profit are cloudy."

Nortel has a long involvement in China and has played a key role in its technological advancement. Nortel maintains a significant research and development centre in Guangdong and a joint research project with Tsinghua University in Beijing. In recent years, Nortel has been winning critical infrastructure network supply contracts such as the US $10 million project to build a citywide fibre-optic broadband network in Shanghai and more recently with China's railway networks including the highly controversial Golmud-Lhasa railway. Nortel now appears poised to provide key communications capacity to Chinese utilities such as water management facilities and energy providers - oil and gas as well as electricity.

Human rights advocates have long claimed that Nortel’s communications technology facilitates the expansion of China’s vast architecture of surveillance, which includes speech and face recognition, closed-circuit television, smart cards, credit records, and Internet surveillance technologies – all used by authorities to control the flow of information and to curb the activities of democracy and human rights activists (see “China’s Golden Shield: Corporations and the Development of Surveillance Technology in the People’s Republic of China” at www.dd-rd.ca).

On January 27, 2006, a shareholders resolution was presented to Nortel by Vancouver-based Ethical Funds Company, stating that the corporation, its officers and its directors may be criminally liable if found to be complicit in human rights violations in China. The resolution requests that Nortel prepare a report for its shareholders by November 2006, describing how its policies and management procedures promote and protect human rights in China and in Tibet and that it cooperate with independent human rights assessments (see: http://www.ethicalfunds.com/do_the_right_thing/sri/shareholder_action/shareholder_resolutions.asp.).

[*Carole Samdup is a program officer at Montreal-based Rights & Democracy. She can be contacted via email.]


- top of page -

 

Rangeland Management on the Tibetan Plateau
By Tenzin Tsultrim


Abstract:

Grassland degradation is today a matter of serious concern for the Chinese government. The issue has worsened since the 1980s and pressure is mounting on the government to find a solution to mitigate the problem. To undo the impacts of more than two decades of modernisation in the pastoral region, the state has adopted some measures, which often ended up with unintended consequences. This article tries to explain why, despite its successful scientific experimentation, the government's approaches have proven futile in restoring the grassland.

Introduction:
Grassland is an essential element of the ecosystem since any changes in its structure or function can have a direct impact on the entire region. Today global grassland resources are degrading fast and threatening pastoral lives; they need to be restored before it is too late.

Degraded grassland is commonly referred to as black beach. These areas are affected by a combination of human activity and environmental factors, mainly overgrazing and climate change, but also livestock increase, human population pressure, encroachment on grassland, inappropriate policies and interventions, and modernization.

Grassland constitutes the largest land ecosystem in China, which holds the world's second largest grassland area after Australia, occupying an area covering over 313.3 million hectares. Grassland degradation and desertification are a serious problem in China today. According to the UNDP's China Human Development Report 2002, desertification costs China about US$2-3 billion annually and an estimated 110 million people suffer first-hand from the impacts of desertification, which is spreading at the pace of 2,500 sq km every year.

Grassland Management and the Government’s Plan:
In Tibet, degradation of the grassland is also an implication of the series of policy changes imposed by the Chinese government. Tibet's grassland, comprising more than 60 percent of the total land area, has long sustained the Tibetan people and their livestock. Despite the harsh and cold climate that puts livestock at high risk, until China invaded Tibet, the Tibetan people and their livestock lived subsistence lives using the grassland resources and have strategically maintained the ecological balance.

Modern pastoral development began in Tibetan nomadic areas in the late 1950s, which is directly related to the issue of grassland degradation on the Tibetan plateau. The government today implements different initiatives to combat the problem, yet the lack of finance and proper understanding of the cause of the grassland degradation has made these initiatives often ineffective.

From the beginning of the 1980s, the new policy of household responsibility system was implemented that marked the end of collective period. First, communal livestock were divided among every family, and then later on formerly communal land was leased out. The state believes that privatization of pasture is an incentive for the herders to protect the grassland.

The reversal of the commune system also brought about new policies of fencing pastures, sowing artificial pastures and settling down herders in permanent housing, which the state views as necessary steps towards modern developed life. As there is a general lack of faith in Tibetan traditional migratory grazing systems, the government feels that fencing can provide reserve pastures during critical periods. Most disturbingly, the division of grassland into subsequent rentals and the visual fixing-in-place effect of barbed wire fences have exacerbated and increased violent conflicts over pasture have resulted into the deaths of at least 29 Tibetans between 1997 and 1999.

In the rush to integrate the herders into the commodity economy, the state has overlooked the inherent constraints and opportunities for nomadic pastoralism in the 'market economy' and in the process has done more harm than good.

Livestock number represents the wealth of a household in a nomadic community, since animals provide food, shelter and clothing. The herders living in this harsh environment try to maximize their livestock as a risk management strategy, since a snowstorm in winter can kill many livestock, threatening the herders’ very survival. But the government considers that an increase in the number of livestock leads to overgrazing, and thus tries to bring the number of animals into balance with the feed resources. However, these policies lack scientific base.

For the herders, the concept of destocking is not a solution to the problem, but an attack on their livelihood. The herders have more confidence in their knowledge than in any government initiatives. Interviews show that they react to government intervention with frustration and scepticism since most cannot afford to destock below what they see as the level that guarantees their survival in case of natural disaster. Therefore, there should be proper negotiation between the government authorities and the herders.

Authorities believe that pests like pika also damage pastures by making burrows. Although, the role of pika in the degeneration of pasture is debated, this perceived tragedy has led the authorities to launch a rodent control campaign in which poison bait is applied directly into or very close to pika burrow holes. These rodenticides also affect non-target species. Further, the use of chemicals can also lead to contamination of air and water when rainwater drains them from the soil surface into the nearby streams. This in turn leads to health hazards when consumed by humans and animals.

Since the establishment of the People’s Republic of China, about 0.67 million hectares of farmland and 2.35 million hectares of grassland have turned to desert, an area the size of a medium-sized country, and this amount is increasing each year. Restoring the productive capacity of degraded ranges is a major undertaking; it is expensive in terms of time, money, and manpower and is very risky. Once the rangeland has moved over to the lower, less productive status and an ecological threshold has been crossed, it is very difficult to return it to a more productive status.

To combat desertification, the government has planted artificial grasses, in particular certain exotic varieties of perennial forage grasses, which could threaten the survival of indigenous species. Though this strategy has proven successful in some areas, in many others it has failed due to poor seed quality, insufficient soil moisture, low fertility, wrong choice of species and lack of monitoring following the seeding.

Conclusion
Rangeland management is more than just a science; it is an art. It is a technique that requires both scientific and traditional knowledge. The management approach requires the talent and perception to detect changes in rangeland vegetation that have taken place in the past, and to detect how different uses are currently affecting the rangelands, as well as the ability to fashion plans to both present range use and future demands. As Miller says, this ‘feel’ for the rangeland can only be achieved by spending considerable time in such areas carefully looking and listening.

New rangeland policies will also have to better demonstrate, in economic terms, the contribution grazing land resources make to overall economic development. This may be an uphill task but policy reform is what China must bear if it is to overcome the problem. And because rangeland degradation has reached the level of crisis in many pastoral areas, there is an urgency to make this a global issue.

[For a full version of this abbreviated paper, please contact the author directly at edd@gov.tibet.net. Tenzin Tsultrim is a researcher at the Environment Desk of the Central Tibetan Administration.]



- top of page -

 

Save wildlife – our common heritage
By Tenzin Tseten*

The destruction of wildlife is happening frequently all over the world. People in this world are so greedy and selfish. As we know we had a large number of wildlife in all the corners of the world but now their population has become less compared to before because of people in this world who just want to show off their wealth and status. Some will use wildlife for their fashion. Mostly all the people are killing the animals for their products like horn, skin and skull etc., as they are so precious and valuable.

The same thing is also happening in Tibet. As we all know Tibet is a very cold country duet to its geographical position. In Tibet, we can find large number of wild animals. So the people in Tibet are using and wearing the pelts of endangered wild animals like tigers, leopards and other animals, which are trimmed on a traditional garment to satisfy one’s desire. It is okay if we use animal products to satisfy basic needs but this is a serious problem if we use it for fashion; killing the animals- which are very necessary for maintaining an ecological balance in nature- for a few fashion-crazy people is really despicable. This balance, as we all know, is very important for human life and its disturbance tends to have far reaching consequences for human life. The very existence of the animals is threatened because their natural habitat is shrinking a lot. All know that animals play an important part in balancing the ecology of nature. We must understand that each animal is a complete habitat with a complex ecosystem. Every single animal has a special role to play in keeping earth’s ecosystem working. If these animals become extinct, the ecological balance and even the survival of the world’s people will be threatened. Tibet’s wildlife are an ecological ‘time bomb’ waiting to explode and disappear in the near future.

The ecosystem of Tibet is home to many endangered species such as the giant panda, drong (wild yak), and antelope, as well as the lipped deer, snow leopard and many other rare species. But now Tibet has become a trap country for these animals and they are suffering a lot.

Through the centuries human activity didn’t interfere with nature. This resulted in a wildlife population explosion to such an extent that sometimes nomads had to hunt the wildlife in order to control the increasing number, which competed with the nomads’ livestock for grazing. Also, in the past before 1959, many western travelers to Tibet had found wildlife in plenty wherever they went. They described Tibet as one of the few places on earth where wild animals migrated freely, going wherever there is grass to graze. But now the size of their populations has become very small. Their products, such as skin, is also used for costumes because Tibetans use the skins of animals on their dress clothing to make it more fashionable and they also use parts of the animal skull to make bangles. So, most of the animals are becoming endangered species or going extinct. As a result, we cannot handle the situation so; we are not supposed to be so cruel. They are also like us; so why are they are killed by the greedy fellow? God created all of us. We don’t have any right to kill them because it is so against our religion, which is based on love and compassion. Morally it is a sin and legally also. It is a punishable activity. For example, actor Salman Khan was recently arrested for killing a single bird. So, we must stop slaughtering animals to satisfy our own desires. To get a minimum amount of happiness we overthrow the maximum happiness. As a result we are now suffering.

At one time, Tibet was amazingly rich in wildlife, but today, the question arises whether the future generation will get a chance to see their entire heritage.

[*Tenzin Tseten is a Xth grade student at Central School for Tibetans, Bylakuppe, India. This essay is one of the winners of an essay competition organized by Dharamsala based Tibetan environmental NGO, Tesi Environmental Awareness Movement (www.ecotibet.org).]

 


- top of page -

 

China hydro-dams leave local Tibetan's poorer
By Chris Buckley (Reprinted from Reuters news, 15 Feb 2006)

BEIJING, Feb 15 (Reuters) - A massive hydro-electric scheme in western China has left locals poor and discontented, a researcher at an official think-tank said, casting doubt on official promises that the country's dams bring prosperity.

Residents in western China's Qinghai province [Amdo region of traditional Tibet] have become poorer despite a project to build 13 hydro-power dams along the Yellow [Machu] River for about 50 billion yuan ($6.2 billion), said Zhou Tianyong, a professor at the Central Party School in Beijing where up-and-coming officials are trained for promotion.

"The more dams that are built, the more we're shifted and the poorer we become, and the more we see the less hope we have," Zhou quoted discontented residents as telling him, according to a report in the Economic Information Daily on Wednesday.

The dams under construction below the Longyang Gorge [including Tsanga Gag or Tsanga Dam (Ch. Longyangxia) and Ngogyai Gag or Ngogyai dam (Ch. Lijiaxia)] in east[ern Amdo region] are surrounded by a population of one million mostly poor farmers and herders, many Tibetan or members of other ethnic groups, the paper said.

They are being built below the main dam at the mouth of the gorge. The main dam began operating in 1987.

Work on some of them began a few years ago, and the project will take a decade or more to complete, according to reports in state media.

Officials promised the dams would "promote local development, but the results of many years of development have been extremely disappointing", the newspaper report said.

Zhou found residents in the area had an average net income of 1,772 yuan ($220) per head in 2004 -- about half the national average -- and loss of land and roads from the dams left many even poorer than before.

About a fifth lived in "absolute poverty" on annual incomes of 625 yuan or less, he said.

NO POWER TO THE PEOPLE

Although they lived close to the dams, they did not have access to its water and relied on infrequent rains for drinking water. And power lines passed over their villages without sharing the electricity generated, he said.

"After the dam water level was raised this year, many farmers and herders around the dam were moved for a second time, but state compensation was meagre and they have suffered big losses and become increasingly poor," the paper said of one of the dams, citing Zhou's report.

The Yellow River dams will have generating capacity of 11.7 gigawatts, compared to the 18 gigawatts the Three Gorges Dam -- the world's biggest hydro-power project -- will have by 2009.

Zhou's findings have emerged at a time when China is planning several other ambitious and controversial hydro projects in [on the Tibetan Plateau] to rival the massive Three Gorges Dam, including a series of dams along the wild Nu [Gyalmo Ngulchu] River in Yunnan province.

Officials and some experts have said those projects will also lift local residents from chronic deprivation. But Zhou said locals often lose out unless the government offers special support and revenue sharing.

He told the paper that "this mode of development ... makes no contribution to local development and lifting farmers out of poverty, and even harms their interests".


- top of page -

 

1. Border Dispute Between China and Bhutan Flares over Rare Fungi
(Sources: WTN Dec 21/05, the Independent, UK Dec 20, 05)

Bhutan has accused China of allowing Tibetans to cross the border to collect the rare Cordyceps mushroom. Also known as the caterpillar fungus, the variety that grows in the region is known as the best in the world and is used medicinally as an aphrodisiac, to improve lung function, and for its anti-aging properties. Collecting the fungus is a lucrative endeavour, as it sells for over $1000/100grams.

Bhutan is especially concerned about the alleged fungi collectors because the 285-mile border between Bhutan and China controlled region of Tibet is disputed, and has in fact been closed since 1960. But recently, melting glaciers have opened up previously impenetratable areas of the border, allowing Tibetans to slip through the unguarded areas. In response, the Tshogdu, Bhutan’s National Assembly, has requested that China provide extra security personnel along the border.

Lately, Bhutan has become especially concerned over the border issue as the Bhutanese claim that China has been building new roads in the region, violating a 1998 agreement under which China agreed to “fully respect the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Bhutan.” As a member of the Tshogdu explained, “There are chances that the chances that the Chinese might build more roads further into our territory and gradually claim the land as theirs since they have their roads on our territory.” He continued, “Bhutan is a small country with limited land so even if we lose a small area, it would be a big problem for our future generations and it also has implications on our country’s sovereignty.” When the Bhutanese brought up the issue with China last year, they were told that roads were being built as part of the economic development of Western China and that the Bhutanese were over-reacting.


- top of page -

Jammu-Kashmir Yet to Conduct Chiru Census in Ladakh
(Source: Indian Express, Jan 2, 06)

Despite an order from the Indian Supreme Court two years ago, the Indian state of Jammu-Kashmir (J-K) has yet to conduct a census of Tibetan antelopes, also known as the chiru deer, in the Ladakh area. The order is in conjunction with another Supreme Court order to ban the manufacture and trade of shahtoosh shawls, made from the fine hair of the chiru. Due to excessive hunting of the animal for its hair, it now verges on extinction. An official from the J-K Wildlife department explained the difficulties in accessing the chiru’s habitat, a remote area near the often-inaccessible Chang Chinuo area of Ladakh, about 400 km from Leh: “We would have to be airlifted. The department approached the Air Force, which agreed but asked to be paid for the sorties,” he said. Further, J-K Chief Wildlife Warden R L Bharti described the difficulties caused by the time frame set out by the Supreme Court: “[A] census in that part of the state can be carried out only between May and June as the weather during the rest of the year is not conducive for the census. No census can be carried out at –40 degrees Celsius.” In a further measure to discourage shahtoosh production and protect the chiru, the J-K Wildlife department also recently announced that all shahtoosh shawls had to be registered. But by the end of December, the deadline for registration, only about 100 shawls had been registered.


- top of page -


Illiteracy and Education levels worsen in the TAR despite development drive
(Source: Tibet Information Network, Jan 23, 2006)

According to a new report by Tibet Information Network, recent statistics coming from the Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR) show that, despite opposite trends in China’s other western provinces, illiteracy rates in the TAR are on the rise while the proportion of the population with primary, secondary or tertiary levels of education is decreasing. The statistics come from a survey of mainly ethnic Tibetans conducted in 2003 and published in the 2004 China Statistical Yearbook. According to the survey, illiteracy rates in the TAR rose from 43.8% in 2002 to 54.9% in 2003; the proportion of the population with at least primary education dropped from 62% in 2002 to 55% in 2003; and the proportion of the population with at least secondary education dropped from 15.4% in 2002 to 14.2% in 2003. This is of particular concern because, in contrast, approximately 50% of the population of Sichuan province - the main source of Chinese migrants to the TAR - have at least a secondary level of education. According to the Tibet Information Network, “Seen in connection with worsening Tibetan levels, this indicates that the competitive educational disadvantages faced by Tibetans within their own towns and cities have continued to worsen with respect to the increasing out-of-province migration to these same towns and cities.” The report sites several reasons for the changes in illiteracy and education levels: a decrease in education spending in 2003, a decrease in the number of primary and vocation schools and a slightly marginal increase in the number of secondary schools despite the severe lack of schools in the TAR, and problems in rural areas such as prohibitive school fees, poor quality of schools, and the use of education as a tool of assimilation into mainstream Chinese society. “If these findings are even remotely accurate they indicate a marked failure of the Western Development Strategies of the PRC to improve education levels among Tibetans, despite official claims to the contrary,” says Tibet Information Network.

 

- top of page -


Iron-Ore Deposits Found on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau
(Source: Xinhua Dec 24/05)


According to the latest geographical survey of the Tibetan Plateau, the region contains three very large iron-rich ore deposits. Zhang Hongtao, deputy director of the China Geological Survey Bureau, told Chinese official media that the size of the deposits ranges from 50 million tonnes to over 100 million tonnes. He further noted that this is a significant find for China, since the country produced close to 30% of world steel in 2004 yet had to import 90% of the required iron. And with recent rises in iron ore prices, the deposits are especially welcome. According to China’s official state media, “The newly found iron ore deposits are expected to help ease domestic supply and boost the development of China’s vast west region.” Western experts, however, are sceptical of these claims. Gabriel Lafitte explains, “iron ore is found in many places, but nowhere in China are the deposits of a grade comparable to what can be imported from other countries.” For example, the iron content of iron ore imported from Brazil and Australia is 55%, while that from Chinese and Tibetan deposits is a mere 33%. Further, Lafitte notes that with this kind of iron ore, smelting is expensive, dirty and wasteful: “This means that the only iron and steel makers with any interest in Tibetan iron ore are far inland, and there aren’t many that are.”

 

- top of page -


Railway Update: Luxury Rail Service from Shanghai to Lhasa

RailPartners, a China-based rail company, has recently sought a US $130 million loan in order to finance a luxury train which would run between Shanghai and Lhasa on the soon-to-be-completed railway line. Dubbed the ‘Dragon Express’ in line with the famous Orient Express, which runs between Paris and Istanbul, the 51 carriage train is set to be built in a joint venture with Canadian company Bombardier and a Chinese manufacturer. For a price of about US $1000 per day, travellers will enjoy such high-end features as king-size beds and butler service. For those with less “cash to burn,” a government run standard train service will also run between Shanghai and Lhasa.

In related news, despite Vice Premier Zeng Peiyan’s assurances that preparations are going well for the trial operation set for July, on January 20 2006, two locomotives collided on the railway line about 120 km outside of Lhasa. The crash, which killed one and injured eight, has been blamed on mechanical failure.

Further down the line, a Chinese scientist predicts graver threats to the new railway line. Wu Ziway, a frozen soil specialist at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, fears that global warming could threaten the railway. According to Wu, “Fast thawing of frozen soil on the [Tibetan Plateau] might greatly increase the instability of the ground, causing more grave geological problems in the frozen soil areas where major projects such as highways or railways run through.” Although he is not the first to warn of such threats caused by global warming, he does forecast it happening much sooner than the previous estimate of 2050.

- top of page -


Bush Forest on Fire in TAR
(Sources: Xinhua Jan 3/06; anonymous)

On January 1, 2006 a bush forest fire broke out in Tingri county, Shigatse prefecture, near Mt Everest in the TAR. Several days later, the fires still raged, aided by strong winds, destroying over 100 hectares of bush area. According to official Chinese sources, over 600 voluntary fire fighters and local forestry police were struggling to put out the fire due to a lack of water sources nearby and the isolation of the site. According to an anonymous source, farmers, who also joined in the rescue efforts, mainly inhabit the region. The fire was eventually extinguished on January 9, and while nobody was harmed by the fire, the cause remains unknown and is still under investigation.

- top of page -


Animal Pelts Burned during Campaign in Rebkong
(Sources: TibetInfoNet Feb 10/06; ICT Feb 9/06; www.rebgong.com)

Coinciding with appeals made by the Dalai Lama and public education campaigns by exile based groups such as the Tesi Environmental Awareness Movement, at the Kalachakra ceremony in Amravati, which took place January 5-16 with an estimated 10,000 Tibetans from inside Tibet in attendance, a grassroots campaign was recently launched in the Amdo area of Rebkong. During the campaign, which began on the first day of Amdo Losar, the local new year (January 29), skins and furs of endangered species were voluntarily surrendered. The campaign was scheduled to end on February 12, to coincide with the last year of the local new year and the celebration of Monlam Chenmo (the Great Prayer Festival). On this day, the skins and furs that had been collected were publicly burned. The campaign centred on Rebkong county (Chin: Tongren, Malho Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture). Initiated by two locals, Tsetan Gyal and Gonpo Kyap, the campaign gathered locals together in the Rongpo monastery courtyard, burned their own animal skin clothing, and urged everyone to stop purchasing endangered animal pelts and join in the campaign. The International Campaign for Tibet (ICT) reported that “Tibetans taking part in the burning of skins have apparently argued that not only is the wearing of skins and furs against Buddhism, but it is also detrimental to the Tibetan economy, because of the high prices Tibetans pay to traders for the illegal skins.”

- top of page -


China Clamps Down on Sky Burials
(Source: The Telegraph, Jan 13 2006; Richard Spencer. As posted on phayul.com)

On January 12, 2006, the Chinese government announced that the practice of sky burial is to be more tightly regulated. The practice, in which dead bodies are cut into pieces and fed to vultures, is the most common method of disposing of the dead among Tibet’s Buddhist population and is quite practical in a region where wood is scarce and the ground remains frozen for most of the year.

Under the new regulations, sky burials will be banned for “diseased or infected” bodies, as well as for the bodies of those who died of unknown causes. The Chinese government claims that these restrictions will be put in place to protect the vultures, a move with which the Tibetan Government in Exile agrees. However, China claims that the new rules are also designed to protect Tibetan traditions. Tibetans abroad, however, argue that the regulations only serve to increase control over religion and culture in Tibet. This is not the first time China has formulated regulations regarding sky burial. Most guesthouses in Lhasa tout signs warning foreigners that they are forbidden from attending sky burials or visiting sky burial sites. However, this regulation is not strictly enforced and therefore abided by few.

- top of page -

 

TEAM Promotes Environmental Awareness at Kalachakra
(Source: WTN Jan 15/06; TEAM press release Jan 14/06)

On December 22, 2005 TEAM- Tesi Environmental Awareness Movement, an NGO run by young Tibetans in exile working to promote environmental education and conservation work- began a three-week environmental leadership and awareness campaign in Amaravati, India to coincide with the 30th Kalachakra held there in January. In addition to distributing brochures and holding an exhibition on endangered species, the campaign also sought to raise environmental awareness through youth empowerment, which was done by offering leadership and service training in ecological issues to a group of thirty Tibetan students from four different schools. The students attended workshops on such issues as waste management and endangered species. In addition, they were also involved in raising awareness among Kalachakra attendees and cleaning up the site. By the end of the training, students had created action plans designed to implement environmental practices and to encourage environmental activism in their schools and communities. “It was not done for ourselves but for the benefit of all. I am proud to do such work and I promise to continue the work [until] the end of my last breath” said Tashi Tsering, a Class XI student who attended the workshops. However, while these campaigns were run successfully, TEAM remained concerned about the large quantities of waste being produced at the Kalachakra. While local Indian officials assisted in cleaning up the site, more than half of the waste produced was plastic, which was then either dumped into a nearby river or burnt in the open air. TEAM hopes that waste management will receive greater consideration in future planning of events of similar magnitude.

- top of page -

 

Tibetan Mastiff Facing Extinction
(Source: WTN Jan 24/06; CRI Online Jan 24/06)

Tibet’s pure-blood mastiff (Drok-kyi) is rapidly decreasing in number, and is facing extinction. The dog, known for its massive size and strength and its adaptability to the high altitude and low temperatures of the Qinghai-Tibet plateau, is a common traditional feature of the Tibetan nomadic household. Among mastiff owners, the dog is regarded as sacred because it is known to protect its territory, to attack intruders while remaining friendly to its owners, and to help guard pasture and animal herds. But due to increasing commercial interests, for which they are crossbred for use as pets or for their meat, Tibetan mastiffs are now an endangered species. In addition, natural degradation is furthering their risk of extinction. Today, a pure Tibetan mastiff is a rare sighting in Tibet. At the same time, Tibetan mastiff protection societies have been set up internationally, such as the American Tibetan Mastiff Association, to preserve pure-blood mastiffs.

- top of page -

 

Songta Dam on Gyalmo Ngulchu (Salween River) Suspended by China
(Source: Wen Wei Po, Jan11; South China Morning Post, Jan 13)

According to Wen Wei Po, a Hong Kong newspaper, the review committee of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA or “Report”) of the Thirteen Dams Project on the Salween River (Gyalmo Ngulchu in Tibetan and Nu Jiang in Chinese) has approved four of the thirteen dams and called for more studies needed for the other nine dams. The proposed Songta dam in Tibetan inhabited areas is one of the nine dams currently suspended. The government has decided not to disclose the Report, with the justification that the Salween is an international river and that the project has downstream international implications.

In 2004, Premier Wen Jiabao took the unprecedented step of suspending the proposed Salween River Project and calling for a thorough scientific study before the decision-making process was to take place. This step came at an opportune time because a new Chinese EIA law based on the American EIA system had become effective a year earlier. Consequently, important legal precedents have been set by the way the Salween Dams project has been handled by the government, under the scrutiny of a variety of Chinese civil society leaders who are demanding public participation in the governance of the project. Environmental activists have been demanding for the release of the Report as well as the holding of public hearings on the project.

- top of page -


Home | Contact

© copyright 1998-2002, Tibet Justice Center

_