|
|
TRIN-GYI-PHO-NYA: Tibet's Environment & Development
Digest
May/June 2005, Vol. 3, No. 2
About
Trin-Gyi-Pho-Nya
Index
of Past Issues
Integrating Legitimate Tibetan Rights
into the “Yangtze Forum" (Tashi Tsering*)
In a remarkable precedent-setting meeting of Chinese
leaders last month in Wuhan (capital city of Hubei Province), provincial
governors and key ministers from different sectors such as water,
environment, forest, and agriculture gathered to develop a common
strategy and action plan for protecting the Yangtze River (Drichu
in Tibetan, “Changjiang” in Chinese) within a river
basin framework of management. From an environmental policy perspective,
this high level discussion of Chinese leaders – the “Yangtze
Forum” – to integrate the agendas of different government
agencies, in order to manage the river within its natural boundary,
is indeed refreshing news.
States around the world, especially in rapidly developing countries
like China, find the task of sustainable management of resources
difficult because of the compartmentalized and autonomous nature
of government agencies. This is exacerbated by states’ contradictory
responsibilities of being both the developer and protector of the
environment. As such there is often the bias toward the development
agencies which usually are more far powerful and often overrun the
efforts of those who are charged with the task of environmental
protection. Such is the case in the management of the Yangtze River.
The headwaters of the Yangtze has been designated as a “state-level
protected nature reserve,” to such a degree that the government
began, in 2004, to forcibly relocate 40,000 Tibetans in an effort
to make “core areas” of the Yangtze, Yellow and Mekong
rivers into a “non-human zone” by 2009. However, this
desperate, undemocratic effort by the Chinese government to protect
the river is scheduled to be shattered by the dam building agenda
of some of its own agencies – powerful bureaucracies like
Ministry of Water Resources, Ministry of Machine Building and Ministry
of Construction. Work preparatory to building some of the world’s
tallest dams in lands of ethnic Tibetans, who have been relocated
in the name of environmental protection, is already underway. One
dam is planned on the Ngagchu (Yalong River) with a height of 175
meters, another on the Thogthon Chuwo (Tongtianhe in Chinese) with
a height of 302 meters, and a third on the Gyarong Ngulchu ( Daduhe
in Chinese) with a height of 296 meters – with an overarching
goal of diverting water into central China.
In China, the need for an integrated river basin management system,
whereby the voices of all the legitimate stakeholders are balanced,
is particularly pressing given the severe water shortages, pollution
problems, and the increasing number of massive protests by dam relocatees
and by farmers over water for irrigation. A representative system
of resource management is increasingly recognized as the legitimate
approach to sustainable development around the world.
The Chinese leaders of the Yangtze Forum, who are concerned with
the legitimacy of their work, should include the voices of leaders
of the otherwise disenfranchised communities, like upstream Tibetans,
in the discussion of the issues in order to demonstrate their concern
for just water governance and should not let this auspicious initiative
become yet another exercise in bureaucratic greenwashing.
*Editor: Trin-Gyi-Pho-Nya. Tashi Tsering is also
the Environment and Development Program Director of Tibet Justice
Center.
- top of page -
|
A Vietnamese refugee as health worker in
rural Tibet
UN News Center – April 28, 2005
On the eve of the thirtieth anniversary of the fall of Saigon,
the United Nations refugee agency today highlighted the success story
of one of its veteran alumni, a 6-year-old Vietnamese boy who fled
in his pyjamas aboard a dangerously overcrowded boat and now works
as a doctor improving childbirth practices on the Tibetan plateau.
Tran Nguyen Toan left his homeland on 17 November 1977 in the family’s
eighth attempt – the others failed because the fishing boat
failed to arrive or the police showed up – after his father,
a businessman, realized that under the new communist regime things
would be extremely difficult and became a fisherman to get the chance
to leave.
What was meant to be a relatively short journey to the Philippines
turned into a two-week odyssey in which the their boat, capable
of carrying 40 but with three times that number, was buffeted by
three huge storms southwards towards Malaysia, the only one of nine
craft that left in that period to make it.
After they hit the shore of Terranganu on Malaysia’s east
coast, ethnic Chinese found them on the beach and gave them clothes
and food, but the police came, beat up the village leader and took
the refugees to a UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNCHR) camp
on Palau Besar, an island off the coast.
After nine months there, Toan, his father and sister were accepted
as refugees by Switzerland where his elder sister was studying in
Lausanne. The first thing the family did was to file the papers
to get Toan’s mother to join them. That took four long years.
After post-graduate work at McGill University in Canada, he continued
with family medicine in Utah in the United States, working with
deprived Latino immigrants for three years. When he had the chance
to work on the Tibetan plateau for a non-governmental organization
(NGO) called One Heart, focusing on maternal and child health around
the time of childbirth in nomadic and rural populations, he seized
it and has been working there for four years.
His choice surprises many of his relatives who wonder why he doesn’t
live in the US, practice medicine, buy a big car and home –
the Vietnamese refugee dream.
But being a refugee creates a bond. “I feel so deeply for
them and those in Tibet,” he says. “I meet ex-refugees
who’ve returned from India and we spend a lot of time talking
about things – this connection of being immigrants and vagabonds
and sharing our lives. I have a deep level of compassion for them
… I [also] love provoking people in high society and showing
them that immigrants and refugees are not parasites of society.”
- top of page -
|
China’s Development Of My Fatherland:
Progress Or Destruction? (Palden Kyab*)
As an overseas free Tibetan, I wish to express my views
on the negative developments in the guise of economic progress that
is sweeping my fatherland, Tibet. China’s colonial exploitation
of Tibet extends beyond the simple exploitation of Tibet’s
resources because it is inseparable from the injustices perpetrated
upon her people. Therefore, I request all people with a sense of
global human responsibility and of care for mother nature to help
mitigate the environmental degradation as a step toward the simultaneous
goal of halting the human injustice.
Tibetans have always had a close relationship with nature –
respecting and preserving nature is a principle theme of Buddhism.
Through the Buddhist prism of interdependence, Tibetans believe
that the environment in which we live sustains our existence. We
believe that there are other sentient beings – animals and
invisible sentient beings such as “Lha” (gods) and “Lu”
(naga’s) – that live around us, sharing the same environment.
If we are not careful with our treatment of nature, we might unintentionally
hurt these sentient beings. As a result, respecting nature became
a part of traditional Tibetan livelihood; it is largely due to our
devotion to Dharma, which is based on “Jhangchup Sem”
(Boddhicitta) or compassion towards all other sentient beings. Not
only is the environment at large protected, but also the precious
minerals accumulated by natural forces are left unexploited.
Today, while the environment of Tibet is being indiscriminately
damaged, the Tibetan people and the animals on the plateau are facing
danger of extermination by the profit-driven Communist China. In
fact, Tibet’s vast land and unexploited rich natural resources
are key factors that lured China to invade Tibet. China’s
hunger for timber, for example, led to official destruction of Tibetan
forests, especially in eastern Tibet (northern Yunnan and western
Sichuan provinces). Trucks loaded with old-growth timber were shipped
to China day and night for decades until the logging ban that was
imposed after the 1998 Yangtze flood in China. Today, mountains
are barren without any trees. Nomadic and semi-nomadic people, and
farmers in particular, suffer famine in many different rural areas.
Rainfall has become more scant, and natural rainfall patterns have
changed due to drastic man-made changes to the environment.
After decades of searching for precious minerals like gold and
copper, China has now begun large-scale exploitation with the help
of foreign technology and capital. This is causing tremendous destruction
of the whole landscape of Tibet. Soil erosion, poorer pasture for
animals, landslides, and other drastic changes in the environment
are forcing some villages to migrate to other places. In addition
to deforestation and mining, there is another growing menace to
the fragile ecosystems of Tibet – Chinese pharmaceutical companies’
hunger for Tibetan medicinal plants. The commercialization of Tibetan
medicine not only endangers the sustainable harvesting of rare medicinal
plants but is also contributing to major soil erosion and landslides.
China’s recent rush to develop the west regions (Go West!
campaign) and the construction of the railway line from Golmud to
Lhasa, not only pose environmental problems but also create problems
for local Tibetans such as forced relocation and uncompensated land
use for the railway line, and so on. Who knows what kind of environmental
problems will arrive once the railway service is in full service?
Will China be able to prevent railway passengers from throwing garbage
like plastics and cans? Will China be able to stop pollution of
the oxygen-sparse air of Tibet? Will China listen, let alone compensate
local Tibetans for the exploitation of their lands?
[Palden Kyab is a student at Berea College, Kentucky.
He may be reached via e-mail at freelance_for_tibet@yahoo.com]
- top of page -
|
The Tibet Railway Nears Completion; Western
Companies Jump Aboard (Freya Putt*)
China’s official news agencies do not always generate
a lot of factual news, but they do give insight into the issues important
to the government. The Tibet Railway is ranking high these days, garnering
eight articles from People’s Daily and Xinhua in April 2005
alone. The railway is the symbol of China’s control over
Tibet and Tibet’s future. It frightens and frustrates Tibetans
and Tibet supporters, while Chinese leaders are desperate to have
it finished. Construction began in 2001, shortly after the Tibet
movement’s major victory in forcing the cancellation of the
World Bank loan for population transfer in Amdo, and the Tibet movement
was geared up for another challenge. Unfortunately, it has been
a hard one to rise to. We have sought effective points of leverage
and not found them, as the Chinese government, pouring in cash and
churning out propaganda, plows ahead and the railway creeps inexorably
towards completion.
The Chinese government’s mega-projects are known for going
overtime and over-budget, but it is clear that in this case, finishing
on time is a priority for them. The railway was originally scheduled
for completion in 2007 – in time for the Beijing 2008 Olympics
– but the date has slowly inched closer. Beijing recently
announced that it would be pumping in another 5.5 billion yuan ($0.6
bn US) to ensure construction of the railway by October 2005. Test
runs are scheduled to begin in July 2006.
Now, three Canadian businesses have announced their involvement
in the railway. Bombardier, a Montreal-based manufacturer of airplanes,
recreational vehicles, and rail transportation equipment, will lead
a consortium that includes Power Corporation of Canada, a financial
holding company, and China South Locomotive and Rolling Stock Industry
(Group) Corporation, to supply the Chinese Ministry of Railways
with 361 specially designed rail cars for the Tibet line. Nortel
Networks, a global telecommunications provider, will supply a digital
wireless communications network (GSM-R). These companies, along
with GE, which will provide the locomotives, are the only foreign
entities known to be directly assisting with the railway.
The three Canadian companies are founding members of the Canada-China
Business Council, unabashed China supporters who have benefited
immensely from close business ties with China. Nortel has worked
extensively with the Chinese government to develop surveillance
technology for use on Chinese citizens. The CEO of Power Corp exclaimed
a few years ago at a trade conference that the 21st century promises
to be "glorious" for China. The companies are already
facing scrutiny in the Canadian media for their involvement in the
railway.
As China races towards the finish line with the project and western
companies obligingly jump aboard, a coalition of Tibet Support Groups
has formed, determined to slow down the completion of the railway
and discourage non-Chinese investment in other Western Development
projects in Tibet. We have a short timeline, but it is essential
that we organize. We may not be able to stop the railway, but we
can stop the countless other projects that make up the Western Development
Plan, the backbone of China’s colonization of Tibet. The Tibet
movement has shown that it can be a force to equal and even overcome
the power of Beijing. Now is the time to demonstrate that force
again.
*Freya Putt is the Program Coordinator of Students
for a Free Tibet (www.studentsforafreetibet.org). She may be contacted
via email: freya@studentsforafreetibet.org
- top of page -
|
Water crisis looms as Himalayan glaciers
retreat
World Wide Fund for Nature*
Himalayan glaciers are among the fastest retreating glaciers
globally due to the effects of global warming, and this will eventually
result in water shortages for hundreds of millions of people who
rely on glacier-dependent rivers in China, India and Nepal, warns
WWF, the global conservation organization.
The warning comes on the eve of a two-day ministerial roundtable
of the 20 largest energy using economies in the world, followed
by a G8 meeting of development and environment ministers focusing
on climate change and on Africa. Both meetings are hosted by the
UK government in London from 15-18 March.
A new WWF report “An Overview of Glaciers, Glacier Retreat
and Subsequent Impacts in Nepal, India and China” exposes
the rate of retreat of Himalayan glaciers accelerating as global
warming increases. The report states that glaciers in the region
are now receding at an average rate of 10-15 meters per year.
“The rapid melting of Himalayan glaciers will first increase
the volume of water in rivers causing widespread flooding,”
said Jennifer Morgan, Director of WWF’s Global Climate Change
Programme. “But in a few decades this situation will change
and the water level in rivers will decline, meaning massive economic
and environmental problems for people in Western China, Nepal and
Northern India.”
The report highlights the risk for two of the meeting’s participating
countries, China and India, where the retreat of glaciers has already
had significant impact in terms of water shortages, more frequent
flooding, retreating wetlands and unstable river systems. In a letter
sent to participating ministers, WWF stresses the need to recognize
climate change as an issue that seriously threatens security and
development prospects.
“The good news is that solutions are at hand to meet the
challenges of climate change, energy security and development needs,
but ministers need to work together to make progress,” said
Jennifer Morgan. “Ministers should realize now that the world
faces an economic and development catastrophe if the rate of global
warming isn’t reduced. All countries must understand that
crossing the 2° C ceiling* is truly dangerous.”
Himalayan glaciers feed into seven of Asia’s greatest rivers
(the Ganges, Indus, Brahmaputra, Salween, Mekong, Yangtze and Huange
He), ensuring a year-round water supply to hundreds of millions
of people in the Indian subcontinent and China. As glacier water
flows dwindle, the energy potential of hydroelectric power will
decrease causing problems for industry, while reduced irrigation
means lower crop production.
Nepal has an annual average temperature rise of 0.06° C per
year. The report shows that three of Nepal’s snow-fed rivers
have shown declining trends in discharge. In China, the report shows
that Qinhai Plateau’s wetlands have seen declining lake water
levels, lake shrinkage, the absence of water flow in rivers and
streams, and the degradation of swamp wetlands. In India, the Gangotri
glacier, which supports one of India’s largest river basins,
is receding at an average rate of 23 metres/year.
For more information, contact WWF’s Communications
Manager: t + 41 79 347 2256, email mhiller@wwfint.org
- top of page -
|
Chinese scientists count 1,091 lakes in
Tibet
(Source: Xinhua. May 9) Tibet has
the world’s largest “lake group,” according to
Zhu Liping, a researcher with the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Institute
under the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Chinese scientists have counted
1,091 lakes larger than one square kilometer in size on the Tibetan
Plateau, totaling 44,993.3 square kilometers in surface area and
608 billion cubic meters of water reserve. According to Xinhua,
Tibet’s lakes represent 70 percent of China’s total
lake water reserve and 49.5 percent of surface area. These statistics
add to the portrayal of Tibet as “China’s biggest water
region” that ought to be dammed for electricity and diverted
to water-scarce areas of the northern China. Yet another aspect
of reality is that the Tibetan Plateau is a very arid region, receiving
far less rain than lowland China. To add to this, almost all authoritative
scientific studies on the main source of Tibet’s water resources,
i.e., glaciers on high mountains of Tibet, predict an apocalyptic
image of the future due to global warming. Therefore, while Tibet
currently has substantial freshwater resources, China’s developers
ought to consider long term sustainability implications of their
development plans on the plateau.
- top of page -
|
Environmental education for community-led
ecotourism in Gyalthang
(Source: WWF-China Newsletter, Vol. 2 No.
1) Local villagers of Gyalthang area in Kham (“Shangri-la”
or Zhongdian in Yunnan Province) “are working with WWF to
develop community led ecotourism projects that will help conserve
the habitat of the endangered black-necked crane, while at the same
time provide direct financial benefits for the local economy. Conducted
by the renowned Chinese ornithologist, Han Lianxian, and facilitated
by WWF, over 40 locals, including representatives from village communities,
nature reserves and local travel companies, recently attended a
workshop to learn how to identify native bird species. The initiative
is part of a WWF China’s Shangri-La sustainable Community
Initiative, which is using education to empower Shangri-la’s
local communities to manage their natural resources in a way that
conserves the environment, maintains cultural diversity, and provides
them with an equitable share of the benefits.”
For more information, Alex Marston’s e-mail
is alex@wwfchina.org
- top of page -
|
China to make Pare Chu river safe for India
(Source: Tibet Information Network. May 2.)
Water Resources Minister P.R. Dashmunsi told the Indian parliament
that China will take steps for the controlled release of water into
the Pare Chu river that had threatened to flood areas of Himachal
Pradesh in 2004. This follows an agreement between the two countries
during Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao's visit to India in April.
According to the minister, Beijing has agreed to take measures for
the controlled release of water accumulated behind a landslide dam
as soon as conditions permit. Major rivers such as the Sutlej, Lohit,
Subansiri and Indus flow into India from Tibet. China has agreed to
provide information on a real-time basis on any abnormal rise or fall
of water levels that could lead to floods. The two sides also agreed
to continue discussions to finalise similar arrangements for the Yarlung
Tsangpo and Lohit (Zayul Chu) rivers that are tributaries of the Brahmaputra.
- top of page -
|
4. Direct bus service links Lhasa and Kathmandu
(Source: China Tibet Information Center, April
26; nepalnews.com, May 1)
Direct “top quality” bus services between the
capital cities of Tibet and Nepal -- Lhasa and Kathmandu –
has recently become operational. The 1,044 km trans-Himalayan bus
service is a three-day journey. According to China Tibet Information
Center, outbound Tibetan passengers can buy tickets straight after
going through passport and visa procedures while overseas passengers
can buy tickets via tourist agencies. According to reports, the
buses are running once a week and may eventually increase the number
of trips. Tickets are priced at 70 US dollars, permitting five kilograms
of personal effects and 15-kilograms of consignment free of charge.
Extra baggage is charged at one US dollar per kilogram. Many stateless
refugee Tibetans in Nepal and India want to avail themselves of
this new and convenient service to visit their Phayul (“fatherland”)
but face the dilemma of having to accept Chinese citizenship.
- top of page -
|
Railway project: Tibetans appeal compensation
over loss of homes, land
(Source: Radio Free Asia. May 9)
Residents of Dongkar, in Toliung Dechen county near the regional
capital of Lhasa, have tried to petition the local authorities regarding
the relocation plans to make way for the Golmud-Lhasa railway line
but to no avail. "The Tibetan farmers went to different departments,
including the Tibetan Autonomous Region government, to appeal but
nothing really helps," an elderly woman from the affected area
told RFA. According to the same source, a local Party secretary
who had tried to speak out on behalf of his community had been stripped
of his post. "So nobody dares to speak out," she said.
Chinese officials had already been to measure her house and land,
with scant interpretation provided in the Tibetan language for local
residents, few of whom speak Mandarin, she said. While the authorities
had promised to relocate them, locals would still have no means
of making a living in the new location, according to Radio Free
Asia. Apparently, there are also some Tibetans who are trying to
take illegitimate advantage of the government’s relocation
and compensation offer.
- top of page -
|
Notice: First conference in Exile to form
Tibetan Chamber of Commerce
(Source: Tibet Support Group e-mail listserve)
The Department of Finance of the Central Tibetan Administration
will organize the first Conference of Tibetan Enterprises in Exile
for two days on 18th and 19th of June 2005 at Golden Huts Resorts
on Delhi-Jaipur Highway in India. “The main theme of this
conference is the formation of Tibetan Chambers of Commerce. Through
this body [the] department would undertake promotional activities
to enhance the business interests of the members.” “Last
date for accepting application has been extended to 15 May 2005.
Since seats are limited, selection will be done on the first come
first serve basis. People are therefore advised to apply as soon
as possible to enable us to book seats for you and confirm your
participation.”
For more information, e-mail paljorresearch@yahoo.com
or research@gov.tibet.net, or telephone ++01892-222487, 223738,
or fax ++0892-222349.
- top of page -
|
New report sheds light on the controversial
dam on Kham’s sacred lake, Megoe Tso
(Report available online: http://www.tibetjustice.org/enviro/megoetso.pdf)
Tibet Justice Center released a comprehensive new report on the
controversial dam project on the ecologically pristine lake in eastern
Tibet called Megoe Tso (or Mugecuo in Chinese). The new report provides
an assessment of the project’s current suspended state within
the context of recent regional developments and China’s larger
dam building trends. It also addresses the putative benefits and
costs of the project based on assertions made by project proponents
as well as the counterclaims made by expert Chinese and Tibetan
environmentalists. It points out that the Chinese government has
yet to account for the traditional Tibetan values and views surrounding
environmental protection and the local people’s relationship
to nature. Researchers and analysts curious about the controversial
dam project will appreciate the report's two appendices: a “Megoe
Tso Timeline,” which chronicles the important events related
to the project, and a bibliography and list of internet resources
of relevance to the project.
- top of page -
|
“Large disputes” among Chinese
experts over Tibet-China water diversion project
(Source: www.h2o.china.com, March 26. Translation:
Dolkar Tenzing) A seminar on the feasibility of the Western
Route of the South-North Water Diversion Project of China was held
in the city of Chengdu, Sichuan Province, on March 24. Li Guoying,
the director of Yellow River Conservancy Committee attended the
seminar along with other experts. There were “large disputes”
among the experts participating in the conference. The water diversion
project (from Tibet into China) concerns the economic development
of six provinces along the construction route. The first phase of
construction is expected to result in diversion of 4 billion cubic
meters of water from Sichuan Province alone, changing the current
condition of water resources distribution and bringing significant
effects on social, environmental, social and economic conditions.
Western Route will also result in shortage of water for Chengdu
city and Mingjiang river.
For more information regarding the project, see our last major news
update
- top of page -
|
Two Tibetans and one Nepali arrested
in India with 44 Leopard and 14 Otter Skins
(Source: Care for the Wild International. April 7)
The Indian police in Delhi had seized 44 fresh leopard and 14 otter
skins and arrested two Tibetans and one Nepali in connection with
the seizure on the same day. According to reports, the three men
were planning to smuggle the skins into Nepal and China “by
using an overnight bus service which links the Tibetan settlement
Majnu Ka Tila in India directly with the Boudha in Katmandu in Nepal.”
“This is yet another reminder of the need to take urgent
steps to raise awareness levels about the devastating consequences
of wildlife crime on wild populations amongst Tibetans”, said
Dr Barbara Maas, Chief Executive of Care for the Wild International.
On April 6, His Holiness the Dalai Lama had joined a campaign to
curb Tibetans’ participation in the trade of endangered species
products by the Wildlife Trust of India and Care for the Wild International,
and others such as Dharamsala based Tibetan environmental NGO named
Tesi Environmental Awareness Movement. “
- top of page -
|
Forced construction of houses for
"town development"
(Source: Tibetan Center for Human Rights and Democracy.
March)
According to a refugee who arrived Nepal from Chamdo (Tibet) on
December 10, 2004: “In 2002, the Tibetan head of Sartsa Village
was asked to quit the post and a Chinese was appointed as the new
village head. Around late March 2002, 30 families living in Dawonang
area near Sartsa Township were issued an order to built double storey
houses on their fields. The order came as part of the town development
plan whereby the towns were to be given a fresh look of development
and modernity. The families approached the officials expressing
their inability to built homes on their fields as they do not have
enough money and also because the field was their source of income.
However, the authorities dismissed the appeal and instead advised
the families to give their houses for rent to cover the expenses.
The authorities said that a new village office would be opened as
well in the new area. It was also declared that anyone who does
not abide by the order will be deemed as harbouring “separatist”
views as both “the land and the sky belong to the Communist
Party.””
“The Tibetans were left with no choice than to follow the
orders from the authorities and built houses on their fields. Each
family had to spend around ten thousand Yuan to built a house. Some
other adjacent fields to the construction site were confiscated
for future development plans. Four families in particular lost huge
fields. They were the Thagatsang, Kartsotsang, Sonam Tentsang and
Khigetsang. On completion of construction, the authorities went
back on their words and didn’t allow the Tibetans to give
their newly built houses for rent.”
- top of page -
|
Mysterious death of 180 bar-headed
geese at Tso-Ngon (Lake Kokonor)
(Source: China Daily, May 10, 2005; Audubon,
November-December 2000)
According to China Daily, Chinese scientists are baffled at the
cause of death of nearly 180 dead bar-headed geese, “a State
second-class endangered animal” near Tso-Ngon in Amdo, also
called the Qinghai Lake, over the past week. “Staff with the
Qinghai Lake Nature Reserve in Northwest China's Qinghai Province
first found 19 dead geese at Bird Island near the western side of
the water last Wednesday. Over the following four days larger numbers
of dead geese were found on the island and in nearby areas.”
Li Sandan, director of Qinghai Forestry Bureau has ruled out severe
infectious diseases, such as bird flu, as the cause death after
laboratory studies. No other birds were found dead around the lake.
Lily Whiteman, writing for the Audubon, a world renowned scientific
magazine on birds, reports: “Every spring, flocks of bar-headed
geese – the world's highest-altitude migrants – fly
from their winter feeding grounds in the lowlands of India through
the Himalayan range, sometimes even directly above Everest, on their
way to their nesting grounds in Tibet. Then every fall these birds
retrace their route to India. With a little help from tailwinds,
they may be able to cover the one-way trip--more than 1,000 miles--in
a single day.”
According to Wen Bo, China Program Director of US-based Pacific
Environment and co-founder of China's first student environmental
network, “Human activities have greatly changed the living
environment of wild birds and affected their breeding activity.
Pesticides and hunting are two major factors blamed for the mass
death of migrant birds.”
|
- top of page -
Home | Contact
© copyright 1998-2002, Tibet Justice Center
|